Since last reset, you are visitor number
.
Appendix
This appendix provides a more elegant view of matters discussed
in the body
of this paper by using space-time 4-vectors not used there, along with some
promised derivations. We postulate first that: (i) displacements
between events in space and time may be described by a displacement 4-vector
X for which the time--component may be put into distance-units by
multiplying by the speed of light c; (ii) subtracting the sum of
squares of space-related components of any 4-vector from the time component
squared yields a scalar ``dot-product'' which is frame-invariant, i.e.
which has a value which is the same for all inertial observers; and
(iii) translational momentum and energy, two physical quantities which are
conserved in the absence of external intervention, are components of the
momentum-energy 4-vector P = m dX/dto, where m is
the object's rest mass and to is the frame-invariant displacement, in
time-units, along its trajectory.
From above, the 4-vector displacement between two events in space-time
is described in terms of the position and time coordinate values for those
two events, and can be written as:
(13)
Here the usual ``Delta''-notation is used to represent the value of final
minus initial. The dot-product of the displacement 4-vector is defined as
the square of the frame-invariant proper-time interval between those two
events. In other words,
(14)
Since this dot-product can be positive or negative, proper time intervals
can be real (time-like) or imaginary (space-like). It is easy to rearrange
this equation for the case when the displacement is infinitesimal, to
confirm the first two equalities in equation (2) via:
(15)
The momentum-energy 4-vector, as mentioned above, is then written
using gamma and the components of proper velocity w = dx/dto as:
(16)
Here we've also taken the liberty to define a velocity 4-vector U.
The equality in equation (2) between gamma and E/mc^2
follows immediately. The frame-invariant dot-product of this 4-vector, times
c squared, yields the familiar relativistic relation between total energy
E, momentum p, and frame-invariant rest mass-energy mc^2:
(17)
If we define kinetic energy as the difference between rest mass-energy and
total energy using K = E-mc^2, then the last equality in
equation (2) follows as well. Another useful relation which follows is the
relation between infinitesimal uncertainties, namely dE/dp = dx/dt.
Lastly, the force-power 4-vector may be defined as the proper time
derivative of the momentum-energy 4-vector, i.e.:
(18)
Here we've taken the liberty to define an acceleration 4-vector A as well.
The dot-product of the force-power 4-vector is always negative. It may
therefore be used to define the frame-invariant proper acceleration alpha, by writing:
(19)
We still must show that this frame-invariant proper acceleration has the
magnitude specified in the text (eqn. 5). To relate
proper acceleration alpha to coordinate acceleration
a = dv/dt = d^2x/dt^2,
note first that c d(gamma)dto = gamma^4 v||/c a, that
dw||/dto = gamma^4/gammaperp^2 a, and that
dwperp/dto = gamma^3 vperp/c v||/c a.
Putting these results into the dot-product expression
for the sixth term in (19) and simplifying yields
alpha^2 = gamma^2/gammaperp^2 a^2 as required.
As mentioned in the text, power is classically frame-dependent, but
frame-dependence for the components of momentum change only
asserts itself at high speed. This is best
illustrated by writing out the force 4-vector components for a trajectory
with constant proper acceleration, in terms of frame-invariant proper
time/acceleration variables to and alpha. If we consider separately
the momentum-change components parallel and perpendicular to the unchanging
and frame-independent acceleration 3-vector alpha, one
gets
(20)
where etao is simply the initial value for eta|| = ArcSinh[w||/c].
The force responsible for motion, as distinct from the frame-dependent rates
of momentum change described above, is that seen by the accelerated object
itself. As equation 20 shows for to,vperp
and etao set to zero, this is nothing more than
Fo = m alpha. Thus some utility for the
rapidity/proper time integral of the equations of constant proper
acceleration (3rd term in
eqn. 6) is illustrated as well.
For more on this subject, see our
table of contents.
Please share your thoughts via our
review template,
or send
comments, answers to problems posed, and/or complaints, to philf@newton.umsl.edu. This page contains original material, so if you choose to echo in your work, in print, or on the web, a citation would be cool. (Thanks. /philf :)